Skip to main content

Part 1: What needs to be done to get INDIA back into 8% growth

Classical economic theory from the time of Adam Smith and Karl Marx considered the four factors of production as Land, Labour , Capital and Entrepreneurship. 
This model was appropriate for Basic agricultural and emerging industrial societies but can be tweaked to encompass factors which are relevant for the modern post industrial era as well. 

For the economic machinery to operate in balance, there are two critical but implicit assumptions : 1) Rule of law 2) Free Market 

Think of the overall economy very simplistically as a very large box full of gears of different sizes - green gears for Land, red for labour and blue for capital and think of entrepreneurs as people who buy these different gears and connect them to a very large rotating shaft of there economy which has a very large number of black gears of different sizes attached to it. 

The job of the entrepreneur is to create his little machine of green red and blue gears and ensure that it’s connected to the right sized black gear in the economic shaft (either directly or indirectly) and everything is moving smoothly. 

A stable, fair and transparent rule of law allows for 2 very important things : 1) no coercion of any sort and 2) contracts can be enforced.
Rule of law creates a high trust society, which increases efficiency all around. In the absence of rule of law, societies rely on family and clans, which by definition reduces the talent and partners pool and therefore the size of the enterprise. 

Free markets allow for everyone to have access to all factors of production equally, for prices to be determined fairly and for anyone to have the ability to enter and exit any business.

Eternal vigilance is the price to be paid for a well functioning free market. The same Principle of “democracy is the least bad system of governance” is applicable to free markets as well. I am not in favour of untrammelled free markets which could lead to monopolies. In fact it means that equal access is not being provided fairly and is actually a breakdown of free market principles
( the principle of easy entry/exit as well as against the principle of lack of coercion).

Similarly, not pricing common resources (such as clean air, water etc ) means again a breakdown of the free market principle of fair pricing of inputs.
In our gear example , free markets means that anyone is free to buy any gear at the right price and connect it to any black gear in the economic machine. 

Rule of law and free markets are complementary in many ways.
In the next parts, let’s analyse what can go wrong based on various policies / market structures. 

To be Continued ... next article: why is stable , fair and transparent Rule of Law critical for a well functioning economy 
  link to next article


Popular posts from this blog

Never Waste a Crisis

“ Never waste a good crisis “Winston Churchill.  There is no doubt that we are in the middle of unprecedented crisis globally. With almost 3 million people infected and over 200,000 people dead due to the corona virus.  Look at the headlines;  ·        German newspaper sends China USD 130 billion invoice against Corona Virus damage ·        Japan to offer billions to firms shifting production out of China ·        Trump warns China of consequences as Republicans and democrats fight over who is cozier with Beijing. It is evident to all but the most perma China bulls that global supply chains will now need a backup if not an alternative to China. The days of running a global factory with slave labour, financial repression (and therefore cheap capital), scant respect to the environment and a bully mercantilist mentality are now numbered. The world is truly unipolar now with China on one side and the rest of the world on the other. Look at the exports and imports

Why a total shutdown in response to the Covid-19 pandemic is a moral imperative for India

Why a total shutdown is a moral imperative in India  There is a viral whatsapp text going on in India about the Protagoras paradox (where both sides have equally valid arguments) being applied to the total shutdown in India ( ). As per this, on the one hand, the argument is that without the shutdown, our health systems MAY be overwhelmed and millions COULD potentially die in India. On the other hand, the increase in poverty that this shutdown WILL exacerbate may lead to a lot more misery and (paraphrasing the great modern philosopher Trump), "the cure may be worse than the disease".   Before we get into the argument and counterarguments, let us remember 2 rules: Rule number 1 : Statistics in the science of large numbers. So any analysis based on early trends when numbers are small may not sustain.  Rule number 2: correlation does not mean causation. What it means that just because 2 things seem t