Skip to main content

Part 2 of What needs to be done to get INDIA back into 8% growth .... Why is stable , fair and transparent Rule of Law critical for a well functioning economy

A stable, fair and transparent rule of law allows for 2 very important things : 1) no coercion of any sort and 2) contracts can be enforced

Let’s take the latter first. If contracts can be easily and timely enforced, it creates a high trust society, which increases efficiency all around. In the absence of ability to quickly and cheaply enforce contracts , societies rely on family and clans and their social enforcement mechanism like ostracism, which by definition reduces the talent and partners pool and therefore the size and output of the enterprise. 

If entrepreneur 1 has setup a b2b business - supplying to entrepreneur 2 under a contract and entrepreneur 2 refuses to honour the contract for whatever reasons, entrepreneur 1’s business is impaired and if it takes years for restitution, many such businesses will not even start reducing the overall output. Therefore countries in which the legal system is slow, complex (like in India) and consequently expensive lose out by having a less thriving economy. 

Ability to function without coercion is equally if not more important. Coercion of any kind , including misusing monopolist power, anti competitive employment contracts, coercive unionisation etc act as sand in the gears of a well functioning economic system. The purpose of “rules” is to ensure that there is a level playing field and coercion is not possible. 
I have personally seen very closely a situation where a powerful competitor used the threat of a series of frivolous legal cases (which would involve high cost and time to defend which the startup could not afford) to effectively shut down a startup competitor- a situation which would not have been possible in a place with quick justice. 

Stability and transparency in the “rules” is important to ensure fair play and long range planning which are needed to build complex economic machines by entrepreneurs.

If rules are not fair ; ie, if the rule making system is captured by vested interests, you get Russia’s oligarchs who capture a disproportionate share of the economy but are themselves subject to sudden seizures and changes in fortune. 

If the local governments apply the rules whimsically and where the courts are suborned to the executive and not independent, then you get the “guanxi” (personal connection) driven economy of China - which is a milder version of the Russian oligarch situation where economic outcomes at the province level depend on guanxi and restitution is not through courts but through appealing to a higher power (the central government). In the absence of a fast and effective judiciary, rules can be applied whimsically by local authorities without any fear of being called out in the short term and therefore it increases friction and one of the critical success factors for entrepreneurs becomes guanxi and not necessarily the strength of their ideas and execution. 

If the government itself does not honour fairly entered contracts (for example state governments choosing to default on their commitments to buy renewable power at premium prices or disputing and delaying regular payments ), it greatly reduces their credibility all around and only entrepreneurs with guanxi (who have the confidence to “manage” the system ) thrive in such an environment. 

There is therefore a very high correlation between rule of law and economic activity and therefore prosperity. It is the foundation on which economic systems are build.

More than any other policy, judicial reforms to make justice quick and efficient would be the biggest contributor to the Indian economy. Simple and stable rules with little leeway for discretion or exceptions is a related and equally important mindset shift. 

To be continued....Next article: free markets and confusions relating to it link to next article


Popular posts from this blog

Never Waste a Crisis

“ Never waste a good crisis “Winston Churchill.  There is no doubt that we are in the middle of unprecedented crisis globally. With almost 3 million people infected and over 200,000 people dead due to the corona virus.  Look at the headlines;  ·        German newspaper sends China USD 130 billion invoice against Corona Virus damage ·        Japan to offer billions to firms shifting production out of China ·        Trump warns China of consequences as Republicans and democrats fight over who is cozier with Beijing. It is evident to all but the most perma China bulls that global supply chains will now need a backup if not an alternative to China. The days of running a global factory with slave labour, financial repression (and therefore cheap capital), scant respect to the environment and a bully mercantilist mentality are now numbered. The world is truly unipolar now with China on one side and the rest of the world on the other. Look at the exports and imports

Part 1: What needs to be done to get INDIA back into 8% growth

Classical economic theory from the time of Adam Smith and Karl Marx considered the four factors of production as  Land, Labour , Capital and Entrepreneurship.  This model was appropriate for Basic agricultural and emerging industrial societies but can be tweaked to encompass factors which are relevant for the modern post industrial era as well.  For the economic machinery to operate in balance, there are two critical but implicit assumptions :  1)   Rule of law 2) Free Market  Think of the overall economy very simplistically as a very large box full of gears of different sizes - green gears for Land, red for labour and blue for capital and think of entrepreneurs as people who buy these different gears and connect them to a very large rotating shaft of  there   economy  which has a very large number of black gears of different sizes attached to it.  The job of the entrepreneur is to create his little machine of green red and blue gears and ensure that it’s connected to t